| 23 |
Hurricane Bret |
Hurricane Bret Loop
showing mature storm with well-developed eye while still over water.
RSO called by SR HQ showed initial stages of eye formation (from Ken
Waters). |
|
24
|
Mesoscale
RSO Applications
|
Some phenomena
that can be seen. Others ? |
|
25
|
4-panel
Great Lakes 14 Nov 95
|
Point out
use of other channels, use more than just visible imagery (especially
at night…switch to fog/stratus product). LES regional scale
images are non-RSO.
|
|
26
|
RSO Great
Lakes Visible 14 Nov 95
|
Lake-effect case that shows
better continuity of features.
1) E. Huron Snowbands
2) IN/OH Cu/snow
3) Cloud field develops downwind
of snow
field
4) Favorable shear profile
over
Lake Huron for
multiple bands
5) Mesoscale lows over the lakes
6) Snowcover in WI
7) Clouds over snow
Infer shear
by snowband type:
Single Band: < 30° of
directional shear from the BL to 700mb
Multiple Bands: 30-60° of
directional shear from the BL to 700 mb
Note - Greater than 60° of
directional shear from the BL to 700 mb is detrimental for lake-effect
snowband development
Cloud
field develops beyond snow cover. Meso-low features over Lakes Superior
and Michigan; radars seldom detect these shallow features.
|
|
27
|
15-minute
Visible - 8 April 1998
|
15-
minute loop. Ask for description of features.
A)
Boundary in N. AL
B)
Regional scale cloud
cover(SE)/clear (NW)
C)
Organized convective lines
D)
Developing squall line NE MS
E)
Splitting storm NW GA
F)
Changes in Cu growth/coverage
G)
Boundaries and their motions
|
|
28
|
RSO
Southeast Loop - 8 April 1998
|
Point out
northward moving boundary that played a key role in the Birmingham
tornado. Boundary also seen on radar, BHM prepared for this.
Noted that F5 started as boundary interacted with existing tornadic
storm.
|
|
29
|
IR
Southeast Loop - 8 Apr 98
|
RSO IR
imagery for 8 April 1998 tornado case. Show usefullness of IR imagery
(Enhanced-V signature), keep the RSO going well into the night if
conditions warrant. (Refer to Enhanced-V training) Ask if the
Enhanced-V can be seen and what it's implications are.
|
|
30
|
Fade of
Visible and IR4 - 8 Apr 98
|
Show
usefulness in AWIPS of being able to combine satellite imagery (also
useful for radar). Show fader - fade, animate, rock. Examine
appearance of boundary and cloud features in VIS and 10.7 um IR.
|
|
31
|
Fade of
Visible and IR2 - 8 Apr 98
|
This is the
VIS/3.9um fader. Notice the similarities and detail in the lower
(warmer) clouds. 3.9um is not affected by the water vapor attenuation
at 10.7 um.
|
|
32
|
Fade
of the IR2 and IR4
8
Apr 98
|
Use IR imagery at night to follow
severe t-storms. Can see low cloud information with enhanced IR
imagery or derived products.
IR-Cloud tops
IR2/Fog-stratus- shows low clouds
verus surface better than IR (10.7um) |
|
33
|
17 May 1996
1km Visible Imagery
|
Nebraska - dryline boundary
with wave near location of storm initiation.
1) Draw
CF from NE NE-Central NE
2) Possibility of a wave near
Hastings
|
|
34
|
17 May 1996
Initiation on
Satellite and Radar Boundaries |
17 May 1996 case, Grand Island,
Nebraska radar with remapped 1km visible imagery (AWIPS-like). Visible
imagery shows the first boundary to the east is not as important as it
may appear on radar alone, deeper clouds on the western line. Note
"extension of radar-range information" in east boundary with
more clouds to the south.
A) These are 2 boundaries- not one
(versus previous loop)
B) There is not a wave on the CF
(initially)
C) Eastern-most boundary looks
most intense on radar- but satellite shows no clouds
D) Radar/satellite shows splitting
storm
E) Use radar and satellite to
compensate for the "cone of silence"
|
|
35
|
Stormscale
Applications
|
|
|
36
|
17 May 1996 -
Storm Splitting |
17 May 1996
case. Are 2 different overshooting tops observable ? Storm splitting
is evident on visible imagery before radar reflectivity. 18 minutes
before upper-level scan and 10 minutes before mid-level scan. These
details evolve in short time frames.
|
|
37
|
31 May 1996
RSO and SRSO
|
1) CO storm forms on Palmer Lake
Divide and moves SE toward a convergence line. (Refer
to LTO session for outflow boundary evolution)
2) Point
out how quickly outflow/RFD develops from the supercell in eastern
CO.
3) Orphan anvil travelling
north dissipates. (Apparently due to storm-scale subsidence)
4) Point
out other storm's outflow interaction N ans E of CO storm. Low cloud
feature SE of CO storm at 224514 is associated with a 70kt storm
outflow according to storm data.
5) Convergence of low cloud and
flanking line results in F2 tornado within 5 minutes after the
interaction (storm chase video).
6)
Also note structure of overshooting tops -
qualitative assessment of divergence and back building anvils.
7)
Explain SRSO- can show important storm-scale features.
|
| 38 |
Miscellaneous uses of RSO |
|
|
39
|
GOES
Assessment Convective Initiation Feedback
|
29 March
1998 case. Development of a storm in Iowa along some boundary that
moved into La Crosse CWA. Feeder bands in northeast Iowa with that
storm. More stable stratiform region further north in Wisconsin. Watch
for storms in the moist sector where more Cu is present.
|
|
40 |
ARX RSO
Visible Loop |
1) Draw WF, CF, Low, and DL
2) Eastern IA MCS forms- moves NE. SW
view of storm shows "feeder bands" -a possible severe
weather indicator.
MCS moved across WF and storms
dissipate. Imagery shows warm front position and weakening of feeder
bands.
3) Warm-sector does not have
homogeneous cloud cover
4) Storms initiate over Council
Bluffs, IA- then move into deeper moisture and develop further.
5) Triple-point storm
initiation
|
|
41 |
G/A RSO Use
After Initiation |
|
|
42 |
Case study-
RSO in Warning Decision Making |
Link goes
to the Cheyenne case, RSO used in warning decision making.
|
|
43 |
Other
examples of using GOES RSO by WFOs |
Link goes
to Western Region RSO GOES Assessment - shows many examples.
|
|
44
|
2 September
98 Los Angeles radar
|
Note thunderstorms
along the higher terrain east of LA. A boundary extends from the storms on the high terrain towards Los Angeles. Later in the loop the storms develop near LA, the storms made the radars go down just after 22:30 UTC
|
|
45
|
2 September
98 IR
|
Thunderstorms developed on the high terrain initially, then dissipated as new storms developed in the Los Angeles area.
|
|
46
|
2 September
98 IR and Visible imagery
|
After the initial activity southeast of LA weakens, new storms develop northwest of the city and form an outflow on their southeast flank (see arc cloud line in vis imagery). The storms are most intense near the intersecting boundaries on the north end of the arc cloud line. The WSR-88D's went down during this time due to severe weather. An RSO was called DURING the event (and started after 00Z). Calling an RSO before the event would've showed the new thunderstorm development over Los Angeles associated with intersecting boundaries with better continuity while the radars were down.
|
|
47
|
2 September
98 Los Angeles radar
|
Radar imagery after it came back online (the severe weather caused an outage). By the time the radar is back up the storms are weakening as they move towards the ocean.
|
|
48 |
GOES
Assessment Feedback |
|
|
49 |
RSO
Conclusions I |
|
|
50 |
RSO
Conclusions II |
Link goes
to RSO student guide on VISIT homepage |
|
51 |
On-station
Training Exercise |
|
| 52 |
About SRSO and AWIPS |
|
|
53
|
|
Shows why
not to view RSO imagery on the CONUS scale
|