Archive for the ‘Severe Weather’ Category

Forecasting Convective Downburst Potential: Update - by Ken Pryor (NESDIS)

Monday, September 14th, 2009

he VISIT lesson “Forecasting Convective Downburst Potential Using GOES Sounder Derived Products” presents current applications of a suite of GOES sounder-derived products. The lesson has been recently revised to include updated imagery examples, and new case studies of downburst events that occurred over the United States Great Plains during June and August 2009. The cases demonstrated the effectiveness of coordinated use of the GOES Microburst products in evolving convective storm environments.  The objective of the lesson is to provide better understanding of techniques for predicting the risk of convective downbursts utilizing GOES sounder derived data.  The guide for the lesson is available at the following web address:  http://www.cira.colostate.edu/ramm/visit/downburst.html .  Also revised is the audio playback version of the lesson, also available on the student guide page.  An example of one of the case studies of a significant downburst event is summarized below. 

During the afternoon of 26 August 2009, strong convective storms developed along a weak, slow-moving cold front as it was tracking eastward over Oklahoma. Although there was very little temperature contrast across the front, the front acted as a convergence zone and a trigger for deep, moist convection. The pre-convective environment downstream of the cold front over western Oklahoma was dominated by vertical mixing that fostered the development and evolution of a convective boundary layer. Elevated Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) imager brightness temperature difference (BTD) values (yellow to orange shading) and Microburst Windspeed Potential Index (MWPI) values in the vicinity of downburst occurrence over western Oklahoma served as evidence of the presence of a well-developed mixed layer. Strong downbursts that were recorded by Oklahoma Mesonet stations between 0000 and 0100 UTC 27 August resulted from a combination of precipitation loading and sub-cloud evaporation of precipitation. These downbursts occurred in proximity to moderate to high microburst risk values as indicated in the 2200 UTC GOES microburst products.

Microburst Risk

Microburst Windspeed PotentialThe images above are a Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) imager microburst product at 2200 UTC 26 August 2009(top) and a corresponding GOES sounder Microburst Windspeed Potential Index (MWPI) product (bottom), with the location of Oklahoma mesonet observations (i.e BESS, WEAT, etc.) of downburst wind gusts plotted on the MWPI image. Both product images displayed convective storms developing along the cold front over western Oklahoma. Convective storm activity increased in coverage near the cold front during the following three hours. Downburst wind gusts between 41 and 56 knots were recorded by the Oklahoma Mesonet stations plotted in the MWPI image above between 0000 and 0100 UTC 27 August.
The following are significant downbursts recorded by the Oklahoma Mesonet during this event:
Station - Time (UTC) - Wind Gust (knots)
Bessie - 0005- 50
Kingfisher - 0020 - 43
Weatherford - 0030 - 41
El Reno - 0040 - 50
Medford- 0055 – 56
 Also important to note the general increase in MWPI values from southwest (BESS) to northeast (MEDF) associated with a progression from hybrid to stronger wet type downbursts. Downbursts over western Oklahoma were predominantly “hybrid” type, while over north-central Oklahoma (MEDF, BREC), downbursts were “wet” type associated with heavy rainfall.

Texas Severe Storm during GOES-11 SRSO: 5 May 2009

Wednesday, May 6th, 2009

On 5 May 2009, NESDIS staff at CIRA called for Super Rapid Scan Operations (SRSO) for GOES-11 due to the forecast of severe weather in Texas.  The GOES-11 SRSO activation is in preparation for the VORTEX-II field project so that high temporal resolution satellite imagery is available for this important field project.

During the VORTEX-II field project (May 10 - June 13) , GOES-11 SRSO will be activated on days when RSO schedule is not in use for GOES-11.  The temporal resolution during an SRSO schedule is one-minute data, however, there will not be continuous 1-minute data due to operational scan sectors:

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/SATS/GOES/WEST/s-srso.html

For this reason, there will be gaps between higher and lower temporal resolution data.

During times of GOES-11 SRSO activation,  the Visible and IR data respectively,  may be viewed on the following web-sites:


http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/projects/svr_vis/vortex2/visloop.asp


http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/projects/svr_vis/vortex2/irloop.asp

You may also view the data on the GOES West Visible Floater sector on the RSO RAMSDIS online page:

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis/online/rso.asp

The visible imagery from 5 May 2009 over Texas may be viewed here:


http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/projects/svr_vis/srso/5may09/visloop.asp

 On this day, a thunderstorm developed along a low-level convergence boundary and quickly became severe.  Hail up to softball size was reported with this storm.  Note the development of inflow feeder clouds along the southern flank of the storm.  The inflow feeder clouds became evident between 0000 and 0030 UTC 6 May, and afterward can be seen moving quickly towards the storm.  The viewing angle from the GOES west perspective offers a favorable perspective of the inflow feeder clouds. There are occasions when GOES-east data will not show this signature over the central US while GOES-west does due to its more favorable view angle.

West Texas Windstorm: 8 February 2009 - Ken Pryor

Wednesday, February 18th, 2009

A convectively active late winter season over the Great Plains has proven fruitful for the assessment of the GOES-11 imager microburst risk product. During the evening of 8 February 2009, a line of convective storms tracked through eastern New Mexico and western Texas, producing several strong downbursts west of Lubbock. This event served as another good example of the utility of the GOESWest (GOES11) imager microburst algorithm described in the previous blog entry (“Forecasting Convective Downburst Potential”, 29 January 2009). This downburst event occurred at the end of a day of boundary layer mixing due to a combination of strong surface heating and low-level wind shear, and thus, demonstrated the importance of the evolution of the convective mixed layer in downburst generation as reflected in the GOES microburst product imagery. The line of convective storms crossed the New Mexico border into Texas around 0100 UTC 9 February. The first downburst recorded in Texas was observed at Denver City West Texas Mesonet station with a wind gust of 47 knots at 0100 UTC, followed by a stronger downburst with a wind gust of 60 knots at 0125 UTC. Further downburst activity was observed at Anton (50 knots) and Reese Center (46 knots) mesonet stations west of Lubbock at 0225 UTC and 0235 UTC, respectively.

0000mbrad.JPG

The image above is a recent example of the GOES11 imager microburst risk product at 0000 UTC 9 February 2009 with overlying radar reflectivity imagery from Lubbock (KLBB) NEXRAD at the time of downburst occurrence at Denver City, 0100 UTC. The product image was visualized by McIDAS-V software, available online at http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/mcidas/software/v/. The image was filtered to display only reflectivity higher than 35 dBZ to emphasize the heaviest precipitation cores where downbursts are likely to be generated. Apparent in the product image is the storm line crossing the Texas border, propagating into a region of high microburst probability as indicated by the progression from orange and red shading in the image. Clouds are represented by light to dark blue shaded areas in the product image. The next product image, valid at 0030 UTC with overlying radar reflectivity imagery at the time of downburst occurrence, shows the eastward progression of the storm line. 0221 UTC radar reflectivity data indicated a small bowing segment of the line northwest of Lubbock (L), associated with the downburst in progress at Anton.

0030mbrad.JPG

Note that the Anton downburst again occurred in close proximity to elevated imager microburst risk values as displayed by darker orange shading. This case demonstrated that the GOES-11 imager microburst algorithm output, when combined with radar reflectivity data into a composite product image, can effectively show forecasters where microbursts are likely. The GOES-11 microburst algorithm models the preconvective environment by utilizing brightness temperature differences between the midwave and longwave infrared channels to approximate favorable temperature and moisture gradients in the boundary layer that would enhance convective downdraft generation. More information about the GOES-11 microburst product can be found in the VISIT lesson titled “Forecasting Convective Downburst Potential Using GOES Sounder Derived Products”.

Forecasting Convective Downburst Potential - by Ken Pryor (NESDIS)

Thursday, January 29th, 2009

The VISIT lesson “Forecasting Convective Downburst Potential Using GOES Sounder Derived Products” presents current applications of a suite of GOES sounder-derived products. A recent concern pertaining to the GOES sounder products is the current temporal and spatial resolution (60 minutes, 10 km). The GOES-R Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) has promising capability as a sounder with greatly improved temporal and spatial resolution as compared to the existing GOES (8-P) sounders. However, until GOES-R soundings and associated derived products are operational, a need has been established for a higher resolution GOES-derived microburst risk product. Accordingly, a multispectral GOES imager product has been developed and experimentally implemented to assess downburst potential over the western United States with improved temporal and spatial resolution. The availability of the split-window channel in the GOES-11 imager allows for the inference of boundary layer moisture content. The experimental product is available on the web:

http://www.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/smcd/opdb/kpryor/mburst/mbimg.html.

 

The GOES-West (GOES-11) imager microburst algorithm employs brightness temperature differences (BTD) between band 3 (upper level water vapor, 6.7um), band 4 (longwave infrared window, 10.7?m), and split window band 5 (12um). A study of the relationship of water vapor radiance and layer-average relative humidity has found a strong negative correlation between 6.7um brightness temperature and layer-averaged relative humidity between the 200 and 500-mb levels. Thus, large BTD between bands 3 and 5 imply a large relative humidity gradient between the mid-troposphere and the surface, a condition favorable for strong convective downdraft generation due to evaporational cooling in the sub-cloud layer. This product provides a higher spatial (4 km) and temporal (30 minutes) resolution than is currently offered by the GOES sounder microburst products (10 km, 60 minutes) and thus, provides useful information to supplement the sounder products in the convective storm nowcasting process.

 

mb08122030a.GIF

 

The image above is a recent example of the GOES-11 imager microburst risk product at 2030 UTC 8 December 2008. Apparent in the product image is clusters of convective storms over the western Texas Panhandle and over eastern New Mexico that would track eastward over western Texas during the following three hours. Associated with the convective storm cluster near the New Mexico border were downburst wind gusts of 50 and

57 knots (plotted in image near the New Mexico border) that were recorded by Plains and Denver City (West Texas) mesonet stations at 2115 UTC. Note that the downbursts occurred in close proximity to elevated imager microburst risk values. The downbursts resulted in the generation of a dust storm over western Texas that affected the Lubbock area (see below).

reesedust_120808.jpg

(Photo:  Texas Tech University - West Texas Mesonet) For more click here.

 

For more information about the GOES imager microburst product, please review the paper published in the preprints of the 16th Conference on Satellite Meteorology and Oceanography:http://ams.confex.com/ams/89annual/techprogram/paper_147786.htm.

Our Thoughts and Hearts Go Out to the Boy Scouts of Nebraska and Iowa

Thursday, June 12th, 2008

june-11.GIF

(From SPC MCD 1327 - Concerning Tornado Watch #509) 

Wednesday night, June 11, 2008, at just after 6:30 PM, some 93 boys, ages 13 to 18, along with 25 adult BSA staff members, were fighting for their lives as a deadly tornado roared through the Little Sioux Boy Scout Camp. Four of the Boy Scouts ended up losing their lives in this fight against Mother Nature while attending what was to be a weeklong leadership training camp.  Over 40 others were also injured and were either rescued and/or attended to by other staff and scouts who used their emergency/first aid training to the best of their abilities.  You couldn’t ask for a better bunch in a situation like this…and even then there were some terrible results.

The synoptic/mesoscale set-up had a cold front extending from a surface low pressure center over eastern South Dakota, south through eastern Nebraska and into central portions of Kansas.  A warm front stretched from the surface low eastward across southern Minnesota (not far north of the Iowa border).  In between these two features lay the warm (and moist) sector with surface temperatures ranging from the mid 70s (north) to nearly 90 (south) and dew points in the upper 60s to lower 70s.  There was also a slowly moving (westward) mesoscale boundary (through Iowa).  Mixed layer CAPE ranged from around 1500 j/kg (north) to nearly 3000 j/kg (south) by this time with lapse rates above 700mb  were running between 7 and 8 deg C/km (there was just a bit of a cap present near and above 600mb that kept the lid on long enough to make things explosive).  Effective shear was running between 40 (far south) and 60 (north in Minnesota) kts with low level storm relative helicities ranging from 200 (south into Kansas) to nearly 500 m2/s2 (north into southern Minnesota and northern Iowa).

Movement of the cold front was to the east…with storms initiating ahead of the cold front along a (pre-frontal) trough from southeastern South Dakota into northeastern Nebraska by 4 PM LDT…back-building south southwestward into south central Nebraska by 5 PM (southwest Kansas also had storms going up by 5 PM).

Many of these storms became tornadic within in the first hour since initiation – first starting over portions of northwestern Iowa and southwestern Minnesota…then with reports following, down the line, into eastern Nebraska and western Iowa soon after.  Kansas then finished off the evening with continued reports up to just after midnight.  All told there were at least 53 separate reports of tornadoes (some reports, however, may be of the same storm) covering the four states of Minnesota, Iowa, Nebraska, and Kansas.  There were five fatalities total (the four in Iowa and one in Kansas) and many, many more injured.       

Please give the kids a second (and third) thought.