Archive for the ‘Research’ Category

Some Great Knowledge, Papers, and Training Materials That You May Have Missed

Thursday, May 1st, 2008

Below are some links to, or copies of, some perhaps lesser known meteorological training materials.  Many of these have been born out of Aviation Weather programs either here in the USA through the military Air Force Weather Agency (AFWA) or the FAA, or from up north and our Canadian Neighbors.  Although some of the information is based on region specific examples, all of it (the principles, etc.) can be applied to most of our own geographic areas. 

First up is a link to NAV Canada, a privately run non-profit organization that operates Canada’s Civil Air Navigation Service.  This section contains an in depth training manuals section that is broken into six geographic regions that cover the whole of Canada.  Truly indispensable stuff here for all but tropical forecasters: NAV Canada Maunuals

Next up is the Air Force Weather Agency’s “Meteorological Techniques” which is an in depth compilation of many various weather forecasting parameters and techniques.  It is another truly indispensable item to be used for review, support, rules of thumb (tricks of the trade).   Also by AFWA, great training, practice, and supplemental review is the manual of the Mesoscale Forecast Process

This paper by John Mecikalski and Kristopher Bedka titled, “Forecasting Convective Initiation by Monitoring the Eveolution of Moving Cumulus in Daytime GOES Imagery” is a little long in the tooth (title-wise), but is definitely worth a read. 

More in the way of research papers / training materails will be posted here from time to time.  If you know of some lesser known, but valuable training for those of us in the weather business, please send us the information so that we may pass in on to others.�

Experimental Warning Program 2008 at NSSL starts April 28, 2008

Tuesday, April 29th, 2008

From NSSL: April 28

NSSL is hosting the six-week Experimental Warning Program (EWP) Spring Program beginning today, 28 April 2008, in the NOAA Hazardous Weather Testbed at the National Weather Center in Norman, Okla. The mission of the EWP Spring Program is to evaluate the accuracy and operational utility of new science, technology, and products in a testbed setting, and to promote collaboration between NSSL scientists and operational meteorologists. NSSL’s goal is to provide an arena for feedback on their experimental products and improve them prior to their potential implementation into NWS severe convective weather warning operations.

The EWP has three primary projects geared toward WFO severe weather warning operations. The first is an evaluation of phased array radar (PAR) technology in Norman, also part of the 2008 Spring Real-Time Phased Array Radar Demonstration, where forecasters will evaluate PAR data in real-time. The second project also involves radar, and is to evaluate the operational utility of a dense network of 3-cm radars (Collaborative Adaptive Sensing of the Atmosphere-CASA) in Central Oklahoma. Both of these projects will be active when severe weather is affecting Central Oklahoma.

Finally, the third project is an evaluation of the utility of gridded probabilistic warnings before they are considered for NWS warning operations. This project is less dependent on local weather since participants can access the needed radar and other data sets remotely for nearly anywhere in the U.S.

Operational activities will take place Monday through Thursday each week; with an end-of-week summary debriefing taking place on Fridays. An internal blog is available where daily outlooks, daily and weekly summaries, and even live blogging will be provided during real-time Intensive Operations Periods.

This week participants are from WFO’s in Flagstaff, Ariz., Columbia, S.C., Wichita, Kan., the NWS Western Region Headquarters, the NWS Warning Decision Training Branch, The University of Oklahoma, the University of Massachusetts, the University of Virginia, and NSSL’s support team.

You can learn more about the EWP here:
http://ewp.nssl.noaa.gov/

Background: The EWP is part of NOAA’s Hazardous Weather Testbed Spring Experiment and is focused on detecting and predicting mesoscale and smaller weather hazards on time scales of minutes to a few hours and on spatial domains from several counties to fractions of counties.

Significance: An effective NWS severe weather forecast and warning program is dependent on providing public and others with critical weather information needs with sufficient advance notice of impending hazardous weather.

4/28/08

What Could Have Been…

Monday, February 25th, 2008

goes-wf.JPG 

(Click for larger view.) 

As many of you know (or may not know) the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) decided to drop plans for the development of the Hyperspectral Environmental Suite (HES) (aka. the Advanced Baseline Imager/Sounder) for the “next generation” of geostationary weather satellites (GOES-R and Beyond). The common line was that NOAA was not confident that a brand new sensor suite could be developed on time and on budget (for the 2012-2014 launch window for GOES-R).

The HES would have taken much more detailed atmospheric (indirect) measurements of temperature, pressure, humidity, etc.for use by our own NOAA/NWS forecasters with the additional ability of being able to ingest this new data into the NWP computer models and greatly improve the ability to predict severe weather events of all kinds.

The HES’s balance of temporal (30 min). spectral (0.5 cm-1), spatial (2-10 km), and radiometric (0.1 K) capabilities would have replaced the current GOES sounder which has 18 spectral bands. With greater temporal resolution (better than 1 hour), high spatial resolution (better than 10 km), high-spectral-resolution (better than single wavenumber - giving a great advantage in vertical resolution), and broad coverage (hemispheric), the HES measurements could have enabled monitoring of the evolution of detailed temperature and moisture structures in clear skies with a high degree of accuracy (better than 1 C root mean square) and improved vertical resolution (about 1 km) over the current GOES sounder.  Compare that to what we get today! (see the following)

goesr_hes.JPG 

The above diagram (click for larger view) compares a real sounding (Fort Worth, TX - FWD in the upper left corner), to that of the current GOES sounder capabilities (in the lower right corner).  Between those two sounding images, and in order of increasing vertical resolution (from 6km on down to 1km), are representations of what soundings would “look Like” at each respective resolution.  Today, the current GOES sounder capabilities fall into the 4 to 5km area.  If the HES were to come to fruition, the 1km resoved sounding would be the norm.  Just compare that to both the actual sounding as well as the what we get today…for use not only as a point sounding…but to also ingest into the NWP models.  Both the weighting function diagram (at the top of this post) together with this sounding difference diagram clearly show why we would gain such a huge advantage over current capabilities.  See the following link (below) for a much more detailed look at what could have been….    

(http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/muri/meetings/2003/HES_Schmit_MURI_2003.pdf)

At the time of the decision to drop the HES, there was even some speculation that made it unclear as to whether or not the GOES-R satellites would carry a sounder at all. Part of the problem stems from the fact that the current GOES sounder will not fit on planned version GOES-R as it stands now.  So, aside from the 75 to 100 million already spent on the possible development of the HES…more money will have to be poured into research and development of a “new” sounder anyway…one that will fit into the planned GOES-R both physically and economically (which is in question of ever being reached at this point)…and one that will offer only marginal improvements over what we have today.      

Part of the problem also comes from NOAA’s (painful) experience in developing the National Polar-orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS). A similar decision was made to cut some instruments from NPOESS…after its projected cost had nearly doubled (to around 14 billion - give or take)…and, partly due to problems developing a complicated sensor package called the Visible/Infrared Imager Radiometer Suite.  So, with NPOESS to learn from, NOAA decided to “cut their losses” early on and start cutting from the future “cutting edge” satellites before they too doubled in price.  Problem is…they are also cutting our forecaster’s collective throats. 

So, in the meantime (not sure how long that will be), the end of the GOES-R HES means that the only place to find high quality soundings will continue to be on-board the spatially and temporally deficient low Earth polar orbiting satellites (POES). Currently, the best atmospheric soundings come from the AIRS instrument on NASA’s Aqua environmental satellite.

Interestingly, their are (at least) two courses that include (further) future plans for the HES to be brought into the GOES program.  One is that a “first run” HES would be put aboard GOES-S and the other has a “beta” version of the HES put aboard GOES-S with the operational version scheduled for GOES-T (for those more cautious I suppose).  However, you have to know that as of now, GOES-R is not scheduled to be launched and (click here for schedule) put into storage until 2014 (two years behind original proposal) and not planned to go operation until 2017.  Then GOES-S follows launch and into storage sometime in 2016 (if it stays on schedule)…to be brought operational in 2019 or 2020.  When exactly GOES-T launches and sits overhead for years without use, is anyone’s guess.  Best case scenario - about 12 years from now we’ll finally get what we should have going up now.  I wonder how many of us will still be forecasting by that time…and what the state of the art will be - that we won’t be able to use for the next 10 to 20 years?    

Perhaps a grassroots movement is in order as there still seems to be plenty of time (6 or more years until GOES-R takes to space) and they have already spent nearly 100 million dollars on the development of the HES.  It will in all likelihood cost at least that much or more to try and shrink what we have now (the current GOES sounder sensor package) in order to fit on board the smaller GOES-R platform.  What are they going to do…leave it off altogether?  Now there is a fightening thought.

J. Braun