The Hewlett Fire

According to reports, a man camping along the Hewlett Gulch trail in Roosevelt National Forest on 14 May 2012 had his camping stove knocked over in a gust of wind. One week (and $2.9 million) later, the Hewlett Fire scorched more than 7600 acres before fire crews could gain the upper hand. At one point 80 homes were evacuated but, thankfully, none of them were damaged. The smoke plume could be seen as far away as Laramie, Wyoming. Less than 20 miles away from the Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, our home, it certainly caught our attention.

VIIRS aboard Suomi NPP monitored the fire day and night. About an hour after the fire was first reported, VIIRS captured the hot spot in channel I-04 (3.7 µm):

Image of the Hewlett Fire from VIIRS channel I-04, 20:05 UTC 14 May 2012

Image of the Hewlett Fire from VIIRS channel I-04, 20:05 UTC 14 May 2012

In the above image, the warmest (darkest) pixel had a brightness temperature of 350 K.  A simple RGB composite of channels I-01 (0.64 µm), I-02 (0.87 µm) and I-03 (1.61 µm), with no other manipulation, from the same time as the I-04 image above, produces a red spot right over the I-04 hot spot:

False color RGB composite of VIIRS channels I-01, I-02 and I-03, 20:05 UTC 14 May 2012

False color RGB composite of VIIRS channels I-01, I-02 and I-03, 20:05 UTC 14 May 2012

Perhaps more amazing (but less useful from a firefighting perspective) is that, if you look closely (and you know the geography of the area), you can make out the locations of the following highways: I-25, I-76 and I-80, plus the main Union Pacific railroad tracks that more-or-less parallel I-80 in southern Wyoming. The high resolution imagery bands on VIIRS have enough resolution to identify interstate highways!

Suomi NPP passed over the area that night (15 May 2012) and the Day/Night Band (DNB) captured the fire burning brightly:

Day/Night Band image of the Hewlett Fire, 08:25 UTC 15 May 2012

Day/Night Band image of the Hewlett Fire, 08:25 UTC 15 May 2012. Image courtesy Dan Lindsey.

By the time of the 17 May 2012 nighttime overpass – two days later – the fire had grown significantly. With no clouds around, the DNB easily saw the Hewlett Fire, as it was the brightest thing in the area. The image below has been enhanced to make the nearby city lights easier to see relative to the fire.

Day/Night Band image of the Hewlett Fire, 09:26 UTC 17 May 2012

Day/Night Band image of the Hewlett Fire, 09:26 UTC 17 May 2012

In the above image, lights from various cities have been identified. The red arrow indicates the Hewlett Fire, which was bright enough and large enough to be confused for a city. The yellow arrow indicates what might be oil and/or gas flares burning in rural Weld County, which you can also see in the 15 May 2012 DNB image. Weld County is home to a third of all the oil and gas wells in Colorado.

In this zoomed-in image, you can see that the light from the fire covered an area approximately one third the size of Fort Collins:

Zoomed Day/Night Band image of the Hewlett Fire, 09:26 UTC 17 May 2012

Zoomed Day/Night Band image of the Hewlett Fire, 09:26 UTC 17 May 2012. Image courtesy Dan Lindsey.

This image was taken before the burn area even reached its maximum size. At the same time, channel I-04 also saw this ring of fire (not to be confused with the “ring of fire” caused by the recent annular eclipse):

VIIRS channel I-04 image of the Hewlett Fire, 09:26 UTC 17 May 2012

VIIRS channel I-04 image of the Hewlett Fire, 09:26 UTC 17 May 2012

Once again, darker colors indicate higher brightness temperatures. The peak temperature in channel I-04 at this time was 356 K.

Even though it caused no damage to homes or structures, it was a little too close for comfort for many people.

As a final note, our partners up the hill in the Department of Atmospheric Science have taken an interest in the Hewlett Fire. If you are interested in the non-satellite side of the research into this fire, research groups led by Professors Rutledge, Kreidenweis and Collett have collected radar observations and in situ aerosol samples of the smoke plume. Contact them for more information.

Popocatépetl, the Smoking Mountain

According to legend, Popocatépetl was a great warrior whose girlfriend, Iztaccíhuatl, died because her father was a jerk who lied. (An alternate story is that it was a rival warrior who was a jerk who lied.) Either way, Iztaccíhuatl was erroneously told that Popocatépetl died in battle, which caused her to die of grief. When Popoca, as he was known to his buddies, returned to find out that she was dead, he was very sad. Reports on what followed differ, but Popoca either died of grief himself, or committed suicide at the thought of living without Iztaccíhuatl. To commemorate these events, the gods turned them both into mountains. To this day, the mountain Popocatépetl spews out rock and ash and fire either because he’s still mad at what happened, or because it is his way of looking out for his girlfriend.

The name Iztaccíhuatl literally means “White Woman,” and is the name of the snow-covered mountain ~40 miles southeast of Mexico City. Popocatépetl literally means “Smoking Mountain,” and is the name given to the volcano just to the south of Iztaccíhuatl. It is one of Mexico’s most active volcanoes.  Ole’ Popoca has recently begun to remind us that he is mad (or eternally vigilant).

The alert level was raised in mid-April after the volcano was heard rumbling and once again began spewing ash over the region. If you clicked on that link, you might have noticed this sentence:

“The joint NOAA-NASA Suomi NPP satellite snapped a picture of the ash cloud coming from Popocatépetl on April 16.”

Although they forgot to include the picture in the article, VIIRS on board Suomi NPP did see the ash cloud. Here’s an image of the I-01 reflectance (white = 1, black = 0) taken by VIIRS on 16 April 2012 at 20:25 UTC:

Image of Popocatépetl's ash plume from VIIRS channel I-01, 20:25 UTC 16 April 2012

Image of Popocatepetl's ash plume from VIIRS channel I-01, 20:25 UTC 16 April 2012

The ash plume is pushed to the east by the winds surrounding the cloud-covered volcano (where the arrow is pointing). On a clearer day, you can see Popocatépetl, Iztaccíhuatl, Matlacuéyatl, and the tallest volcano in Mexico, Pico de Orizaba:

False-color RGB composite (I-01, I-02 and I-03) from VIIRS taken at 19:53 UTC 23 May 2012

False-color RGB composite (I-01, I-02 and I-03) from VIIRS taken at 19:53 UTC 23 April 2012

The above image is a false-color RGB composite of VIIRS channels I-01, I-02 and I-03 taken at 19:53 on 23 April 2012. The volcanoes and nearby urban centers have been identified and labelled. Pico de Orizaba, Popocatépetl, and Iztaccíhuatl are the first, second and third tallest mountains in Mexico, respectively, and are normally the only mountains in Mexico to be snow-covered year-round. The snow on top of Pico de Orizaba and Iztaccíhuatl is clearly visible in the image. Popocatépetl lost its snow during the 1990s when it became more active. But, you can see the cloud of ash and steam from the volcano in the image, which is not being blown around in the wind as much on this day. In fact, you can watch a time-lapse video of the steam and ash cloud from a Mexican government webcam from around the time of the Suomi-NPP overpass where you can see the clouds produced/influenced by The Smoking Mountain.

On 20 April 2012, a photographer captured this amazing image of Popocatépetl’s eruption of lava at night. Being near a new moon (which occurred on 21 April), the Day/Night Band (DNB) was able to see this lava eruption:

VIIRS Day/Night Band image of the Popocatépetl eruption from 07:58 UTC 20 April 2012

VIIRS Day/Night Band image of the Popocatepetl eruption from 07:58 UTC 20 April 2012

VIIRS I-01 image of Popocatépetl taken at 19:53 UTC 23 April 2012

VIIRS I-01 image of Popocatepetl taken at 19:53 UTC 23 April 2012

In the above images, the red arrows are pointing to the same spot – the top of Popocatépetl. The upper image is from the DNB at 07:58 UTC on 20 April 2012, the lower image is from I-01 at 19:53 UTC on 23 April 2012 (the same time as the RGB composite). If you were to overlay the images on top of each other, you would see that the light source visible in the DNB image is right at the top of the volcano. Since there are no towns up there, and people surrounding the volcano have been evacuated, the light is coming from the erupting lava.

CIMSS provided these images of the volcano and ash plume at night (the same time as the DNB image above), which were visible in channels I-04 and I-05:

Image of Popocatépetl from VIIRS channel I-04, 07:58 UTC 20 April 2012

Image of Popocatépetl from VIIRS channel I-04, 07:58 UTC 20 April 2012 (courtesy William Straka, III / CIMSS)

Image of Popocatépetl from VIIRS channel I-05, 07:58 UTC 20 April 2012

Image of Popocatépetl from VIIRS channel I-05, 07:58 UTC 20 April 2012 (courtesy William Straka, III / CIMSS)

The upper image is the I-04 image. Channel I-04, at 3.74 µm, is very sensitive to hot spots such as wildfires or, in this case, volcanic eruptions. The dark (warm) spot identified is the heat signature of the molten rock that is erupting from the volcano. The cooler (brighter) ash cloud is visible in the I-04 image, but it shows up more clearly in the I-05 (11.45 µm) image underneath it.

Someone compiled a time-lapse series of images (14 April – 22 April) of Popocatépetl from a “NASA satellite” (presumably GOES-13) and posted the video to YouTube, which you can watch here.

Given its proximity to Mexico City, Popocatépetl is on the list of dangerous volcanoes to watch out for. The folks at WIRED are keeping their eye on it. Hopefully, Ole’ Popoca is just letting off a little steam, and not planning to get real violent. His girlfriend died a long time ago – it’s time to just let it go already.

Time-lapse of the Lower North Fork Fire

On 26 March 2012, strong winds, high temperatures and low humidities re-ignited embers from a controlled burn that took place the previous week near Conifer, CO. The Lower North Fork fire quickly spread in the high winds, eventually burning more than 4000 acres and damaging or destroying 27 homes. Three people were killed, presumably because they were unable to evacuate before their homes were engulfed in flame. One family’s daring escape from the fire was caught on a cell phone camera and made national news (CAUTION: strong language has not been edited out). Many interesting pictures of the fire may be found here, here, and here.

Channel I-4 of VIIRS (centered at 3.74 µm) captured the hot spot from the Lower North Fork fire on each of Suomi-NPP’s afternoon (ascending) overpasses last week. These images make up the loop shown below.

5-day loop of I-4 images of the Lower North Fork fire

5-day loop of afternoon I-4 images of the Lower North Fork fire

In this image loop, the color scale represents observed brightness temperature such that warmer pixels appear darker and cooler pixels appear lighter. Pixels warmer than 330 K appear black, and pixels colder than 250 K appear white. The time between each image in the loop is approximately 24 hours.

The first image in the loop, taken at 20:24 UTC on the 26th, captured the hot spot shortly after the fire was first reported. The hot spot as seen by I-4 expanded significantly during the first 24 hours, before lighter winds and firefighting efforts greatly limited the growth of the fire. Over the last three frames, the hot spot can be seen to cool and shrink slightly.

Low (liquid) clouds can be seen as dark splotches on the images from the 28th and 29th of March, which should not be confused with fires. This is due to the fact that liquid clouds are highly reflective at 3.7 µm, and the reflection of solar radiation during the day increases the observed brightness temperature, so they appear darker. The persistently bright sideways “C” shape to the northeast of the fire is Chatfield Reservoir, which has a low brightness temperature due to the low water temperature in the reservoir and the relatively low emissivity of liquid water at this wavelength. Cherry Creek Reservoir (to the northeast of Chatfield Reservoir) and Marston Lake (to the north of Chatfield Reservoir) can also be seen.

With clear skies, the burn area shows up quite clearly in the I-band false color RGB composite of I-1, I-2 and I-3, taken at 20:06 UTC 27 March 2012 – the same time as the second frame of the loop above.

RGB composite of VIIRS channels I-1, I-2 and I-3 of the Lower North Fork fire, 20:06 UTC 27 March 2012

RGB composite of VIIRS channels I-1, I-2 and I-3 of the Lower North Fork fire, 20:06 UTC 27 March 2012

The burn area shows up as a sizeable dark brown spot in the forests (which show up as green) southwest of Denver.

After the driest and warmest March on record in Denver, hopefully this is not the start of a long, devastating fire season (link goes to PDF file).

I- and M- Band Views of the Heartstrong Fire

The Heartstrong Fire in Yuma County, Colorado, 18 March 2012

The Heartstrong Fire in Yuma County, Colorado, 18 March 2012 (uncredited photo)

On 18 March 2012, very warm, very dry and very windy conditions existed throughout eastern Colorado. Surface observations showed temperatures in the 70s and 80s, dew points in the teens and 20s, and sustained winds at 20-30 knots (gusting over 40 knots). Wind gusts up to 60 knots (~70 mph) were reported.

Surface observations, 19:00 UTC 18 March 2012

Surface observations, 19:00 UTC 18 March 2012 (courtesy UCAR)

A red flag warning was issued for nearly all of eastern Colorado. And with good reason! A grass fire started in Yuma County, CO (which borders Nebraska and Kansas) in the early afternoon, and quickly grew out of control. The media dubbed it the Heartstrong Fire. An area 14 x 16 miles had to be evacuated, although only 2400 acres actually burned. The smoke plume was easily visible from the Goodland, KS, National Weather Service radar. Two homes were destroyed, and three firefighters were injured battling the blaze.

Radar image of smoke from the Heartstrong Fire, 21:17 UTC 18 March 2012

Radar image of smoke from the Heartstrong Fire seen by the Goodland, KS, NWS radar, 21:17 UTC 18 March 2012 (courtesy UCAR)

"True Color" image of the Heartstrong Fire, 19:34 UTC 18 March 2012

"True Color" image (RGB composite of VIIRS channels M3, M4 and M5) of the Heartstrong Fire, 19:34 UTC 18 March 2012

Even though cirrus clouds covered the area (as seen in the true color image above), VIIRS observed the fire in its two 3.7 µm channels. The VIIRS images shown here, from 19:34 UTC, were taken roughly 20 minutes after the fire was first reported. The moderate resolution band M-12 (centered at 3.7 µm) identifies a hot spot (which shows up as black in the image below) that is approximately 6 pixels by 3 pixels. With ~750 m resolution at nadir in this band, that corresponds to a total area of 10.2 km² of pixels that contain a fire signal.

Image of the Heartstrong Fire from VIIRS channel M-12, 19:34 UTC 18 March 2012

Image of the Heartstrong Fire from VIIRS channel M-12, 19:34 UTC 18 March 2012

The high resolution imagery band I-4 (centered at 3.74 µm) also identifies the hot spot. In this case it is approximately 11 pixels by 5 pixels in size. At ~375 m resolution at nadir, this corresponds to an area of 7.7 km² of pixels that contain a fire signal.

Image of the Heartstrong Fire  from VIIRS channel I-4, 19:34 UTC 18 March 2012

Image of the Heartstrong Fire (indicated by the red arrow) from VIIRS channel I-4, 19:34 UTC 18 March 2012

Thus, the difference in resolution between these two channels leads to a difference in the apparent size of the hot spot as seen by satellites. However, it should be noted that this apparent size is only an estimate of the size of the hot spot visible in the satellite image, not the actual size of the fire. Fires move in narrow flame fronts that cover only a small percentage of the pixel area. From a firefighting perspective, detecting which pixels actually contain fire and where the actual burning occurs within those pixels are two different things.

Of additional interest is the difference in observed brightness temperatures between these two channels. The warmest pixel in M-12 was 327 K, while the warmest pixel in I-4 was 342 K. As the observed brightness temperature is related to the fraction of each pixel covered by fire, the higher resolution images produce higher brightness temperatures in the hot spot.

This means that, to a human observer, the hot spot appears larger in the M-band image, while, from an automated algorithm point-of-view, the I-band image has a larger number of pixels within the hot spot, and higher brightness temperatures. The difference in the appearance of the hot spot between these channels is more clearly seen in the figure below. Be sure to click on the image, and then look for the “1700×702” link above the image title and click on that to see the comparison in its highest quality.

Comparison between the I-4 and M-12 views of the Heartstrong Fire

Comparison between the I-4 and M-12 views of the Heartstrong Fire. The previous I-4 and M-12 images (taken at 19:34 UTC, 18 March 2012) have been zoomed in for additional clarity.

As an additional note, band M-13 (centered at 4.05 µm) is the primary band used in active fire detection. This band was designed specifically to measure the radiative signal of hot spots without sensor saturation. The M-13 image of the fire is shown below.

Image of the Heartstrong Fire taken by VIIRS band M-13, 19:34 UTC 18 March 2012

Image of the Heartstrong Fire from VIIRS channel M-13, 19:34 UTC 18 March 2012

There is a dedicated team of researchers actively exploring fire detection from VIIRS. You can learn more about fire detection and the status of their current fire detection products by visiting viirsfire.geog.umd.edu.